Supreme Court to weigh opening of what could be nation’s first religious charter school (2025)

The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments Wednesday over what could be the nation’s first religious public charter school, part of a clash over religious liberty that has split Republicans in Oklahoma.

Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt supports the opening of St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School. He said denying the religious charter school’s operation would violate the Constitution’s free exercise clause and “sanction open religious discrimination in the distribution of an otherwise equally available public benefit.”

He argues that nonreligious entities can open charter schools and St. Isidore should have the same right.

Charter schools are publicly funded but independently operated, giving parents options outside traditional neighborhood schools.

“Allowing religious institutions the generally available public benefit of a school charter will bolster educational opportunities, educational diversity and parental school choice,” Mr. Stitt, a Republican, wrote in a filing before the justices.

Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond, also a Republican, opposes the charter school board’s authorization of St. Isidore’s opening.

He said the Oklahoma Constitution requires public school systems to be “free from sectarian control.” The problem, as he lays out in his court filing, is that St. Isidore incorporates Catholic teaching.

“In violation of the Oklahoma Constitution and United States Constitution, the State, through the Board, approved the application, executed the sponsorship contract, and unlawfully established the nation’s first religious public school,” Mr. Drummond said in his court filing.

The charter school board approved St. Isidore’s application, but Mr. Drummond went to the Oklahoma Supreme Court to halt it. The court sided with him.

The charter school board and the school took the dispute to the U.S. Supreme Court.

If the high court sides with the Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board, St. Isidore will become the nation’s first religious charter school.

The justices will decide whether the exclusion of a religious charter school violates the First Amendment’s free exercise clause or whether the state can justify the exclusion.

Ilya Shapiro, senior fellow and director of constitutional studies at the Manhattan Institute, noted recent precedent. The high court said that if a state establishes a program that is generally available to all, it cannot discriminate on religious status when distributing that program.

He pointed to two recent cases: one in which the justices said a program used to refurbish playgrounds in Missouri had to include church playgrounds and another in which the justices said Maine officials couldn’t prevent state-funded tuition from going toward religious private schools.

“States fund plenty of nonprofit independent organizations to provide lots of social services,” Mr. Shapiro said. “This is going to be a pretty contentious argument.”

Robert Tuttle, a George Washington University Law School professor, said those cases are different. Although the money came from the state, he said, the funding decision was ultimately made by individuals using the grants, not the state itself.

“In those cases, it is fair to say the state is not responsible at all if the parent chooses to send their children to a religious school versus a nonreligious school,” he said, different from the Oklahoma charter school situation.

“This is direct sponsorship of religious education,” Mr. Tuttle said.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett is recused from the case. Court watchers suspect it was because of her connection to one of the people defending the school’s opening.

The cases — Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond and St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School v. Drummond — were consolidated. A decision is expected by the end of June.